Best on laptop or desktop
The Premis™ BriefEarly access

Most failed initiatives were working on the wrong problem. Are you solving the right one?

Clear diagnosis. Transparent reasoning. Honest about its limits.
Try:
1
Research
~40s
2
Classify
~15s
3
Hypothesize
~15s
4
Test Design
~60s
Reading the problem
Diagnosing:
01Classify: What kind of problem, and what decision actually needs to be made
02Hypothesize: What's most likely broken, and what would change that view
03Interrogate: The issue tree, built to test the diagnosis
04Design the Test: What to prove and how to prove it
Premis frames. You decide.
When to use it
When everyone in the room disagrees on what's actually broken, and the cost of misdiagnosing it is months of executive time lost in revisiting problems.These are "wicked problems" — Rittel & Webber, Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Policy Sciences, 1973.
Most organizations reach for a solution before they’ve properly identified the problem. An initiative gets launched, a framework gets applied, resources get committed — and months later, executives realize that the numbers haven’t moved, or the issue keeps reoccurring, because the intervention addressed the symptom rather than the cause. The framing of the problem was never really questioned.

The Premis™ Brief takes the problem you’re sitting with — the one where the room is split on what’s wrong, or the initiative that keeps stalling, or the decision that keeps getting deferred — and runs it through a rigorous four-stage diagnostic a senior consultant would apply at the start of an engagement. What kind of problem this actually is. What’s most likely causing it. What you’d need to examine to confirm that. And what you’d need to see to change your mind.
The Premis™ Brief is built for business leaders who don’t have a consultant hired and want the problem defined before anyone starts spending time and money on the answer. The Premis™ Brief takes minutes and produces something you can act on: a structured brief that names the hypothesis, the issue tree, the tests, and the limits of the analysis.

The value isn’t that it gives you the answer. It’s that it forces the right question to be asked before anyone starts spending time and money on the answer.
Most AI tools treat every problem as something to be answered. The Premis™ Brief treats it as something to be understood first. It doesn’t generate recommendations — it builds a diagnosis with the reasoning visible, the alternatives weighed, and the gaps named. What you get is a structured read on what’s actually broken and not a list of things to consider.
The ones that matter and aren’t straightforward. Where smart people in the room disagree on what’s wrong. Where an initiative has stalled and no one’s sure why. Where a decision keeps getting deferred because the problem hasn’t been properly framed. If the cost of getting the diagnosis wrong is measured in months and meaningful resource, this is where The Premis™ Brief earns its place.
A four-stage brief: what kind of problem this actually is, what decision needs to be made, what’s most likely wrong and why, and what you’d need to run to prove or disprove it. Download it, share it, or walk into a room with it.
It tells you what it knows, what it doesn’t, and what would change its view. Treat it as a serious first read — rigorous enough to act on, honest enough to know where it runs out. The call is still yours.
Your input is processed to run the diagnostic and not stored or shared beyond that. The terms ask that you don’t enter confidential or proprietary information — the same standard you’d apply to any professional tool that sends text to an external API.

Consulting has always rewarded the specialist. The evidence — and the nature of the problems now arriving on consulting's doorstep — suggests it shouldn't be the only path.
Read the piece →

Early Access

Premis is in active development. If you're working on complex enterprise problems and want to stay close to what's coming, register your interest.